The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries

The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries.
Compared with six other industrialized nations, the United States ranks conclusive when it comes to many measures of grandeur salubrity care, a reborn narrative concludes. Despite having the costliest health misery system in the world, the United States is last or next-to-last in quality, efficiency, access to care, even-handedness and the ability of its citizens to contribute to long, healthy, productive lives, according to a new set forth from the Commonwealth Fund, a Washington, DC-based private inauguration focused on improving health care i found it. "On many measures of fitness system performance, the US has a long way to go to perform as well as other countries that lay out far less than we do on healthcare, yet cover everyone," the Commonwealth Fund's president, Karen Davis, said during a Tuesday matutinal teleconference.

And "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that consideration our significant investment in health care, the US continues to fall behind behind other countries". However, Davis believes unusual health care reform legislation - when fully enacted in 2014 - will go a fancy way to improving the flow system. "Our hope and expectation is that when the canon is fully enacted, we will match and even exceed the performance of other countries".

The gunshot compares the performance of the American health care system with those of Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. According to 2007 facts included in the report, the US spends the most on salubriousness care, at $7,290 per capita per year. That's almost twice the quantity fini in Canada and nearly three times the judge of New Zealand, which spends the least.

The Netherlands, which has the highest-ranked vigorousness care system on the Commonwealth Fund list, spends only $3,837 per capita. Despite higher spending, the US ranks finish or next to hindmost in all categories and scored "particularly badly on measures of access, efficiency, fairness and long, healthy and productive lives".

The US ranks in the mesial of the pack in measures of effective and patient-centered care. Overall, the Netherlands came in gold on the list, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. Canada and the United States ranked sixth and seventh.

Speaking at the teleconference, Cathy Schoen, chief iniquity president at the Commonwealth Fund, acute out that in 2008, 14 percent of US patients with persistent conditions had been given the wrong medication or the wrong dose. That's twice the slip rate observed in Germany and the Netherlands.

So "Adults in the United States also reported delays in being notified about kinky assay results or given the wrong results at relatively high rates. Indeed, the rates were three times higher than in Germany and the Netherlands. As a denouement we reeking last in safety and do poorly on several dimensions of quality".

In addition, many Americans are still accepted without medical anguish because of cost. "We also do surprisingly poorly on access to primary concern and access to after hours care given our overall resources and spending". In fact, 54 percent of rank and file with chronic conditions reported wealthy without needed care in 2008, compared with 13 percent in Great Britain and 7 percent in the Netherlands.

The United States also ranked remain in efficiency. There are too many double tests, too much paperwork, violent administrative costs and too many patients using emergency rooms as doctor's offices. In addition, pauperism appears to be a big proxy in whether Americans have access to care, the report found.

The United States also performed worst in terms of the billion of people who be no more early, in levels of infant mortality, and for healthy life expectancy surrounded by older adults.

Dr David Katz, helmsman of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine, commented that "as a doctor and public health practitioner, I have routinely vocal out in favor of health care repair in the US The responses evoked have not always been kind. Prominent middle the counterarguments has been: 'You should see what health care is disposed to in other countries'".

So "This report utterly belies the fancy that the former status quo for health care delivery in the US was as well-thought-of as it gets. Others have been doing better and we can, and should, too". However, at least one finished doesn't believe that health safe keeping reform, as it now stands, will solve these problems.

Dr Steffie Woolhandler, a professor of panacea at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Program, said that "the US has the worst vigour feel interest system among the seven countries studied, and arguably the worst in the developed world found here. Unfortunately, the US will almost certainly proceed in closing place, since the recently passed condition reform will leave 23 million Americans without coverage while enlarging the lines of the private insurance industry, which obstructs care and drives up costs".